OK, I get it! Those of you who voted for Mrs. Clinton are upset, so you think the only way to express your disappointment is to protest, destroy property, extend the middle finger to buildings with the Trump name on them and call all Trump supporters racists, homophones, xenophobes and every filthy name you can find.
OK, I get it! Those of you who voted for Mr. Trump are upset at those on the other side, so you think the only way to express your feelings is to act arrogant, look down your noses at liberals, produce memes and writings that are designed (but don't) to initiate humor, use filthy language to describe people of different persuasions and forward stories on Facebook, that have ‘shocking headlines’ that have absolutely nothing to do with the article which they are attached or out-and-out lies!
Oh, I agree you both have a first amendment right to say or write anything you choose, and I support that right; but do you think you are doing anything positive? “oh yes, we are bringing attention to the problem” is the common response – which is nothing more than a mantra that says ‘if they don’t agree with me they’re wrong’, at which point you both begin calling the other side names.
Prior to the election, the Conservative side complained about the Electoral College, and ‘how fixed’ it was, and the Liberal side it was fine with it, because Mr. Trump might get the ‘popular’ vote but Mrs. Clinton would receive most the Electoral vote. (because that’s what the news media said)
Wait a minute! So soon we forget?
In all honesty, I don’t know if the Electoral College is the correct way to choose a President. It is, however, what has been in place for a very long time; and I can’t remember any riots in the past, when the popular vote result was different than the Electoral vote result. I don’t have any suggestion for a replacement – but it isn’t the popular vote! (it seems odd to call it a popular vote, when those who voted were split by a small percentage and only a little over 57 percent of eligible voters voted).
Frankly, I find those statistics shameful! There are Countries who would give their lives to get a chance to vote; and those that have, see a much larger turnout – even when their lives are threatened.
Let’s change it! OK, let’s change the way we choose a President: The United States Electoral College is established by Article Two of the United States Constitution to select the President of the United States and Vice President.
So, it’s in our Constitution; the only way to change it is via an Amendment.
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.
It seems to me that the current election cycle has shifted power in the Congress in such a way that getting 2/3 majority to begin the change, probably isn’t practical.
How about a Constitutional Convention? Well we have 50 States, which means at least 34 States must call for the Convention. But that’s not all! Should the Convention decide to propose an Amendment, ¾ of the States (38) are needed to approve the proposed Amendment and make it law.
You tell me; is it quicker to protest, burn, call names and hate each other until the law is changed, or to look across the divide and realize that there may be a majority (if you combine forces) to at least begin dialogue on the matter.
Webster says a bigot is: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.
Kind of puts a different slant on things, doesn’t it?
WAKE UP FOLKS! YOU AREN’T HELPING A THING, YOU’RE JUST CAUSING MORE PROBLEMS.